SOURCE: Jane Ruby, Dr. Jane Ruby Show, 27 Apr. 2022
REVIEW On 27 April 2022, a video published by the Dr. Jane Ruby Show went viral on social media, in which Jane Ruby attributed the formation of “fibrous clots” in the lungs to COVID-19 vaccines. In the video, Ruby showed an image of a white gelatinous mass, resembling a cast of the airways. Ruby claimed that the image had been sent to her by a nurse and that this gelatinous mass was coughed up by a 32-year-old patient in the ICU, who had received two doses of the COVID-19 vaccine and was described as otherwise healthy. Ruby claimed that this medical condition had not been previously seen.
Ruby didn’t provide information that would allow viewers to ascertain the provenance of the photo or the veracity of the claims about the patient. However, gelatinous masses in the lungs, resembling the one shown in Ruby’s video, were described well before COVID-19 vaccines were even developed. Mentions of such a disease date back to 1861[1]. These are caused by a rare medical condition called plastic bronchitis, which can have different causes, including asthma, tuberculosis, cystic fibrosis or rheumatoid arthritis[2]. Another cause of plastic bronchitis is the leaking of lymphatic fluid into the lungs, which is called lymphatic plastic bronchitis[3].
Lymphatic plastic bronchitis is characterized by the formation of large, highly branched bronchial casts, in which the accumulated lymphatic fluid takes a gelatinous consistency[3]. In contrast, smaller and simpler structures are usually formed when the cause is other than lymphatic disease. Plastic bronchitis causes breathing difficulties and coughing, which can sometimes result in the bronchial cast being coughed up.
The gelatinous mass shown in Ruby’s video (right) appears very similar to a bronchial cast caused by plastic bronchitis (left). These large, highly branched casts are usually formed due to leaking of lymphatic fluid into the lungs. Picture on the left from Penn Medicine.
Ruby claimed that this gelatinous mass was caused by COVID-19 vaccines, stating that the vaccines contain “self-assembling nanoparticles”. There is no evidence that COVID-19 vaccines contain self-replicating materials, as this previous Health Feedback review explained. The material that forms bronchial casts comprises various proteins like mucin or fibrin, and even different types of white blood cells, depending on the cause of the plastic bronchitis[4].
This isn’t the first time that Ruby falsely claimed the COVID-19 vaccines contained dangerous materials. In the video, Ruby also repeated several debunked claims about COVID-19, such as the claim that there is no asymptomatic transmission of the disease (which was covered in this previous Health Feedback review) or that young children have a 100% chance of recovery (which was covered in this other Health Feedback review). Ruby also claimed that COVID-19 vaccines were the cause of blood clots found in the lungs of dead bodies, a claim that isn’t substantiated by scientific evidence, as Poynter explained.
In conclusion, Ruby’s claim that “fibrous clots” in the lungs were due to COVID-19 vaccines is based solely on an unverified anecdote using a photo of unknown provenance. There’s no scientific evidence supporting the claim that COVID-19 vaccines cause these “fibrous clots”. Her claim that such a condition was unheard of before COVID-19 vaccines is inaccurate, as plastic bronchitis, which was already identified in the 1800s, can produce similar-looking gelatinous masses called bronchial casts. Plastic bronchitis can be due to a variety of causes, including infectious diseases or leaking of lymphatic fluid into the lungs. To date, there have been no reported cases of this rare condition linked to COVID-19 vaccines.
COVID-19 Lung clots Vaccine
Published on: 01 May 2022 | Editor: Rubén Portela Carballeira
Health Feedback is a non-partisan, non-profit organization dedicated to science education. Our reviews are crowdsourced directly from a community of scientists with relevant expertise. We strive to explain whether and why information is or is not consistent with the science and to help readers know which news to trust. Please get in touch if you have any comment or think there is an important claim or article that would need to be reviewed.
Get email news updates: Follow us:
See how we rate claims
We depend on your support to operate. Help us create a more trustworthy Internet!
Apply to become a reviewer
Our method to evaluate articles
Our method to evaluate claims